Audit on the Quality of Handovers of a Psychiatric Liaison Team in the UK: a Short Report.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND The importance of handovers has been recognised and proven in clinical practice. In liaison psychiatry, this is particularly important due to the high turnover of patients seen, the shift work pattern and the number of member staff engaging in this process. An Audit on the Quality of Handovers was carried out within a Psychiatric Liaison team of a General hospital in UK with an intention to review and improve this. METHOD Handovers were evaluated against the gold standard of the SBAR tool (Situation/Background/Assessment/Recommendations) over a period of 4 weeks. Handovers were assessed by 2 members of staff (a Consultant & a Specialty doctor). Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS Results showed that the team's handover practice is mostly "Good" but there was also an amount of "Poor" under "Situation & Background", mostly presented by mid-grade doctors & trainees. Nurses scored higher than medics on overall rating, nearly 50%.This could be attributed to the fact that handovers form an essential & integral part of Nurse's training & culture. Also mid-grade (staff grade) doctors have had a significant amount of "excellent" scoring that other groups didn't have, mostly on the Assessment & Recommendations domains, which can be attributed to the fact that importance is stressed more on the assessment & treatment module by the doctors. CONCLUSION The multi-disciplinary composition of the liaison psychiatry team has a positive impact on the patient care. This audit has revealed overall good communication amongst the members of the team, nevertheless one that needs some improvement, particularly amongst the doctors. Doctors tend to focus on the remedial (assessment & treatment) module rather than the holistic approach. SBAR remains an effective & handy tool to improve the handover quality. A re-audit will be carried out in 6 months time to assess the improvements observed following the implementation of this new tool.
منابع مشابه
Auditor Tenure, Auditor Industry Expertise, and Audit Report Lag: Evidences of Iran
The findings of theoretical investigations indicate that short-term auditor tenures may contribute to further audit report lags (ARLs). On the other hand, auditor industry expertise represents one of the determinant factors contributing to audit quality, which has been widely studied in numerous researches. Indeed, the better the quality of audit, the less delayed would be the audit report. As ...
متن کاملEffectiveness of the Auditor's Opinion Quality of Pygmalion Effect
The opinion of the audit is the final product of the audit process and a means of expressing the judgment of the auditor about the quality and content of the client's financial statements and plays a major role in creating confidence and convenience among users of financial statements, and at the top of their shareholders and investors. Since the audit report involves information and the means ...
متن کاملThe mental health nurse: a valuable addition to the consultation-liaison team.
Nurses, particularly those working in non-psychiatric settings, report that they do not feel adequately prepared to meet the mental health needs of patients. The psychiatric consultation-liaison nursing role has arisen in part, as a response to these difficulties and aims to facilitate access to mental health nursing expertise for general hospital patients and staff. The impact of the introduct...
متن کاملThe Impact of Dual Role of Forensic Accountant-Audit Firm's Partner on Audit Quality
Many data are effective in audit quality that are not part of the audit requirements. One of them is the personal characteristics of the auditor, such as skills and expertise. Forensic accountants have the skills need to spend on specialized fraud courses that they lack a formal non- forensic accountant. To investigate the Impact of dual role of forensic accountant- Official Accountant and audi...
متن کاملSpecial Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts
Background Healthcare organisations in England rated as inadequate in terms of leadership and one other domain enter the Special Measures for Quality (SMQ) regime to receive increased support and oversight. There is also a ‘watch list’ of challenged National Health Service (NHS) providers at risk of going into SMQ that receive support. There is limited knowledge about whether the interven...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Psychiatria Danubina
دوره 29 Suppl 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017